Micron Document
Livres et Wikis | Archives | Info


Cartesian fibration
layout: Wide Β· Narrow Β· Centered
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
top
In mathematics, especially homotopy theory, a cartesian fibration is, roughly, a map so that every lift exists that is a final object among all lifts. For example, the forgetful functor

QCoh β†’ Sch {\displaystyle {\textrm {QCoh}}\to {\textrm {Sch}}}

from the category of pairs ( X , F ) {\displaystyle (X,F)} of schemes and quasi-coherent sheaves on them is a cartesian fibration (see Β§ Basic example). In fact, the Grothendieck construction says all cartesian fibrations are of this type; i.e., they simply forget extra data. See also: fibred category, prestack.

The dual of a cartesian fibration is called an op-fibration; in particular, not a cocartesian fibration.

A right fibration between simplicial sets is an example of a cartesian fibration.

Contents

β€’ Definition
β€’ See also
β€’ Footnotes
β€’ References

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Definition

Given a functor Ο€ : C β†’ S {\displaystyle \pi :C\to S} , a morphism f : x β†’ y {\displaystyle f:x\to y} in C {\displaystyle C} is called Ο€ {\displaystyle \pi } -cartesian or simply cartesian if the natural map

( f βˆ— , Ο€ ) : Hom ⁑ ( z , x ) β†’ Hom ⁑ ( z , y ) Γ— Hom ⁑ ( Ο€ ( z ) , Ο€ ( y ) ) Hom ⁑ ( Ο€ ( z ) , Ο€ ( x ) ) {\displaystyle (f_{*},\pi ):\operatorname {Hom} (z,x)\to \operatorname {Hom} (z,y)\times _{\operatorname {Hom} (\pi (z),\pi (y))}\operatorname {Hom} (\pi (z),\pi (x))}

is bijective.cite-ref-1[1]cite-ref-2[2] Explicitly, thus, f : x β†’ y {\displaystyle f:x\to y} is cartesian if given

β€’ g : z β†’ y {\displaystyle g:z\to y} and
β€’ u : Ο€ ( z ) β†’ Ο€ ( x ) {\displaystyle u:\pi (z)\to \pi (x)}

with Ο€ ( g ) = Ο€ ( f ) ∘ u {\displaystyle \pi (g)=\pi (f)\circ u} , there exists a unique g β€² : z β†’ x {\displaystyle g':z\to x} in Ο€ βˆ’ 1 ( u ) {\displaystyle \pi ^{-1}(u)} such that f ∘ g β€² = g {\displaystyle f\circ g'=g} .

Then Ο€ {\displaystyle \pi } is called a cartesian fibration if for each morphism of the form f : s β†’ Ο€ ( z ) {\displaystyle f:s\to \pi (z)} in S, there exists a Ο€ {\displaystyle \pi } -cartesian morphism g : a β†’ z {\displaystyle g:a\to z} in C such that Ο€ ( g ) = f {\displaystyle \pi (g)=f} .cite-ref-3[3] Here, the object a {\displaystyle a} is unique up to unique isomorphisms (if b β†’ z {\displaystyle b\to z} is another lift, there is a unique b β†’ a {\displaystyle b\to a} , which is shown to be an isomorphism). Because of this, the object a {\displaystyle a} is often thought of as the pullback of z {\displaystyle z} and is sometimes even denoted as f βˆ— z {\displaystyle f^{*}z} .cite-ref-4[4] Also, somehow informally, g {\displaystyle g} is said to be a final object among all lifts of f {\displaystyle f} .

A morphism Ο† : Ο€ β†’ ρ {\displaystyle \varphi :\pi \to \rho } between cartesian fibrations over the same base S is a map (functor) over the base; i.e., Ο€ = ρ ∘ Ο† {\displaystyle \pi =\rho \circ \varphi } that sends cartesian morphisms to cartesian morphisms.cite-ref-5[5] Given Ο† , ψ : Ο€ β†’ ρ {\displaystyle \varphi ,\psi :\pi \to \rho } , a 2-morphism ΞΈ : Ο† β†’ ψ {\displaystyle \theta :\varphi \rightarrow \psi } is an invertible map (map = natural transformation) such that for each object E {\displaystyle E} in the source of Ο€ {\displaystyle \pi } , ΞΈ E : Ο† ( E ) β†’ ψ ( E ) {\displaystyle \theta _{E}:\varphi (E)\to \psi (E)} maps to the identity map of the object ρ ( Ο† ( E ) ) = ρ ( ψ ( E ) ) {\displaystyle \rho (\varphi (E))=\rho (\psi (E))} under ρ {\displaystyle \rho } .

This way, all the cartesian fibrations over the fixed base category S determine the (2, 1)-category denoted by Cart ⁑ ( S ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Cart} (S)} .cite-ref-6[6]

Basic example

Let QCoh {\displaystyle \operatorname {QCoh} } be the category where

β€’ an object is a pair ( X , F ) {\displaystyle (X,F)} of a scheme X {\displaystyle X} and a quasi-coherent sheaf F {\displaystyle F} on it,
β€’ a morphism f Β― : ( X , F ) β†’ ( Y , G ) {\displaystyle {\overline {f}}:(X,F)\to (Y,G)} consists of a morphism f : X β†’ Y {\displaystyle f:X\to Y} of schemes and a sheaf homomorphism Ο† f : f βˆ— G β†’ ∼ F {\displaystyle \varphi _{f}:f^{*}G{\overset {\sim }{\to }}F} on X {\displaystyle X} ,
β€’ the composition g Β― ∘ f Β― {\displaystyle {\overline {g}}\circ {\overline {f}}} of g Β― : ( Y , G ) β†’ ( Z , H ) {\displaystyle {\overline {g}}:(Y,G)\to (Z,H)} and above f Β― {\displaystyle {\overline {f}}} is the (unique) morphism h Β― {\displaystyle {\overline {h}}} such that h = g ∘ f {\displaystyle h=g\circ f} and Ο† h {\displaystyle \varphi _{h}} is ( g ∘ f ) βˆ— H ≃ f βˆ— g βˆ— H β†’ f βˆ— Ο† g f βˆ— G β†’ Ο† f F . {\displaystyle (g\circ f)^{*}H\simeq f^{*}g^{*}H{\overset {f^{*}\varphi _{g}}{\to }}f^{*}G{\overset {\varphi _{f}}{\to }}F.}

To see the forgetful map

Ο€ : QCoh β†’ Sch {\displaystyle \pi :\operatorname {QCoh} \to \operatorname {Sch} }

is a cartesian fibration,cite-ref-7[7] let f : X β†’ Ο€ ( ( Y , G ) ) {\displaystyle f:X\to \pi ((Y,G))} be in QCoh {\displaystyle \operatorname {QCoh} } . Take

f Β― = ( f , Ο† f ) : ( X , F ) β†’ ( Y , G ) {\displaystyle {\overline {f}}=(f,\varphi _{f}):(X,F)\to (Y,G)}

with F = f βˆ— G {\displaystyle F=f^{*}G} and Ο† f = id {\displaystyle \varphi _{f}=\operatorname {id} } . We claim f Β― {\displaystyle {\overline {f}}} is cartesian. Given g Β― : ( Z , H ) β†’ ( Y , G ) {\displaystyle {\overline {g}}:(Z,H)\to (Y,G)} and h : Z β†’ X {\displaystyle h:Z\to X} with g = f ∘ h {\displaystyle g=f\circ h} , if Ο† h {\displaystyle \varphi _{h}} exists such that g Β― = f Β― ∘ h Β― {\displaystyle {\overline {g}}={\overline {f}}\circ {\overline {h}}} , then we have Ο† g {\displaystyle \varphi _{g}} is

( f ∘ h ) βˆ— G ≃ h βˆ— f βˆ— G = h βˆ— F β†’ Ο† h H . {\displaystyle (f\circ h)^{*}G\simeq h^{*}f^{*}G=h^{*}F{\overset {\varphi _{h}}{\to }}H.}

So, the required h Β― {\displaystyle {\overline {h}}} trivially exists and is unqiue.

Note some authors consider QCoh ≃ {\displaystyle \operatorname {QCoh} ^{\simeq }} , the core of QCoh {\displaystyle \operatorname {QCoh} } instead. In that case, the forgetful map restricted to it is also a cartesian fibration.

Grothendieck construction

Given a category S {\displaystyle S} , the Grothendieck construction gives an equivalence of ∞-categories between Cart ⁑ ( S ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Cart} (S)} and the ∞-category of prestacks on S {\displaystyle S} (prestacks = category-valued presheaves).cite-ref-8[8]

Roughly, the construction goes as follows: given a cartesian fibration Ο€ {\displaystyle \pi } , we let F Ο€ : S o p β†’ Cat {\displaystyle F_{\pi }:S^{op}\to {\textbf {Cat}}} be the map that sends each object x in S to the fiber Ο€ βˆ’ 1 ( x ) {\displaystyle \pi ^{-1}(x)} . So, F Ο€ {\displaystyle F_{\pi }} is a Cat {\displaystyle {\textbf {Cat}}} -valued presheaf or a prestack. Conversely, given a prestack F {\displaystyle F} , define the category C F {\displaystyle C_{F}} where an object is a pair ( x , a ) {\displaystyle (x,a)} with a ∈ F ( x ) {\displaystyle a\in F(x)} and then let Ο€ {\displaystyle \pi } be the forgetful functor to S {\displaystyle S} . Then these two assignments give the claimed equivalence.

For example, if the construction is applied to the forgetful Ο€ : QCoh β†’ Sch {\displaystyle \pi :{\textrm {QCoh}}\to {\textrm {Sch}}} , then we get the map X ↦ QCoh ( X ) {\displaystyle X\mapsto {\textrm {QCoh}}(X)} that sends a scheme X {\displaystyle X} to the category of quasi-coherent sheaves on X {\displaystyle X} . Conversely, Ο€ {\displaystyle \pi } is determined by such a map.

Lurie's straightening theorem generalizes the above equivalence to the equivalence between the ∞-category of cartesian fibrations over some ∞-category C and the ∞-category of ∞-prestacks on C.cite-ref-9[9]

See also
Footnotes

cite-note-11. ↑ Kerodon, Definition 5.0.0.1.
cite-note-22. ↑ Khan 2022, Definition 3.1.1.
cite-note-33. ↑ Khan 2022, Definition 3.1.2.
cite-note-44. ↑ Vistoli 2008, Definition 3.1. and Β§ 3.1.2.
cite-note-55. ↑ Vistoli 2008, Definition 3.6.
cite-note-66. ↑ Khan 2022, Construction 3.1.4.
cite-note-77. ↑ Khan 2022, Example 3.1.3.
cite-note-88. ↑ Khan 2022, Theorem 3.1.5.
cite-note-99. ↑ An introduction in Louis Martini, Cocartesian fibrations and straightening internal to an ∞-topos [arXiv:2204.00295]

References

β€’ citerefkhan2022Khan, Adeel A. (2022). "A modern introduction to algebraic stacks".
β€’ citerefkerodon"Kerodon".
β€’ citerefmazel-gee2015Mazel-Gee, Aaron (2015). "A user's guide to co/cartesian fibrations". arXiv:1510.02402 [math.CT].
β€’ citerefvistoli2008Vistoli, Angelo (September 2, 2008). "Notes on Grothendieck topologies, fibered categories and descent theory" (PDF).

Further reading

β€’ https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Cartesian+fibration
β€’ https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Cartesian+morphism
β€’ https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Grothendieck+fibration